Create New Account

Go Back   Brian Manzella Golf Forum > Golf Discussions > Golfing Discussions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2009, 08:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA.
Posts: 872
Default European Tour Data

Flightscope data from a recent Euro Tour event. Guess who it hit the longest drive in 4 days of tracking the 15th hole?

http://dps.twiihosting.net/pga/doc/c...oc_528_827.pdf

http://www.europeantour.com/default.sps?pagegid={AEFB93B0-EFF5-4C05-AB0F-FD08D947D944}&eventid=2009040&infosid=43
mb6606 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 08:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
otto6457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Rawls Course, Texas Tech
Posts: 197
Default A bit confused

KARLSSON, Robert 116 172 2496 468 11.3 110 7.5 278

KAYMER, Martin 115 170 2418 263 8.4 78 6.3 298

We see here that Kaymer has slower club speed, ball speed, and lower launch angle, yet is 20yds longer than Karlsson.

Can someone explain this to a confused soul?
__________________
“I've spent most of my life golfing - the rest I've just wasted".
otto6457 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 09:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA.
Posts: 872
Default

Probably a typo, gust of wind or misread of some kind. Click the second link and check the other 3 days - Kaymer's numbers are where they should be.
mb6606 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 11:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 602
Default

The difference between Daly and Quiros makes no sense to me. Daly hits it farther with significantly slower club/ball speed and more spin, and with launch parameters that are very close to Quiros?
niblick1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 11:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
glcoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 1,109
Default

There are a lot of weird scenarios in that document. What was amazing to me is how far some of the slower swing speeds were carrying their ball.
__________________
"Learn to wallop the ball with your pivot" - Manzella
glcoach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 11:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
tennisdu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 108
Default

Do they have the angle of attack numbers?
tennisdu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 11:48 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
ggsjpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 546
Send a message via Skype™ to ggsjpc
Default

flightscope is the answer to the question, "Why don't these numbers make sense?"
__________________
John Graham-I choose to argue the opposite side, whether or not I believe it, because that is how I learn new information and challenge the information I have.
ggsjpc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 10:58 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 112
Send a message via MSN to alexlimco Send a message via Skype™ to alexlimco
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ggsjpc View Post
flightscope is the answer to the question, "Why don't these numbers make sense?"
So are those mere mortals like us without those aids are doomed for golf failure? God forbid
__________________
2 cents ain't much, but that's all I have
alexlimco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10